Welcome to you all. It’s been a while, I know and it is good to see you again. A new project… Existentialism and Free Will.
Why this combination of themes? Free will has always been debated in philosophy, but only in logical arguments.
These days, however, there are people, who claim to have empirical evidence, neurological evidence, that free will is just an illusion created by the brain.
We never were shocked by the argument that because God knows EVERYTHING, so…also what I will say in the next lines,
it is impossible, that free will can exist, because while I believe I choose freely, God already knew what I would choose.
We will look into this debate later in the project of course. However, empirical evidence…. neurological evidence ? That is a different story.
Funny thing is, that by saying this I am in fact already begging the question of this project: why should empirical evidence have so much more weight than logical conclusions from an argument?
Existentialism, in a nutshell, is completely based on the assumption, that we make choices. Because we are free to choose due to our free will, it makes us morally responsible.
Now, assume that this idea from neurobiological quarters is true, that free will is in fact an illusion, then logically all fundamental ideas of existentialism are based on an illusion,
which would mean that we could forget about existentialism as a view of man and his condition. Someone even might say, that existentialism thus in fact is like any other religion.
Ok, somebody might protest here and say: Hold on…do you mean that any religion is based on an illusion? Personally I would answer the question with “Yes”.
For I still do not understand how it is possible to murder your fellowmen and justify such actions by referring to religious believes.
Only homo sapiens murders and kills, motivated by believes, not only religious ones, but equally political and ideological ones.
This brings us close to a quintessential element of this project: individualism. According to the dictionary it means
“Belief in the primary importance of the individual and in the virtues of self-reliance and personal independence”
or “a social theory advocating the liberty, rights, or independent action of the individual”.
More scientifically formulated along the lines of thought of Max Weber in his “Economy and Society” (1922) it amounts to the idea,
that social phenomena must be explained by showing how they result from individual actions, which in turn must be explained through reference to the intentional states that motivate the individual actors.
Thus we could come to the observation, that existentialism is based on free which which as such shapes the individual and thence society, that is, our culture.
Now look at the conversation in the cartoon of psychiatrist doctor Sigmund, which was published in my newspaper last week.
Patient: Doctor Sigmund, my end is near and that is about time, because I act arrogant and superior and expect, that everyone thinks like I do.
Doctor Sigmund: Tell me…. Do you happen to be Western Civilization?
Patient: Beware, you may use that term only in a mocking and dismissive way.
It is 2015 and a cartoonist feels, that his is the right moment to create this cartoon. Where does such an idea come from? Why does it emerge now?
I’ll offer you the following interpretation. Just like Samuel Huntington predicted are we now in the midst a clash of civilizations, as he described in his article in Foreign Affairs in 1993.
In the introduction of his book (1996) “The Clash of Civilizations And the remaking of World Order” he writes:
“One grim Weltanschauung for this new era was well expressed by the Venetian nationalist demagogue in Michael Dibdin's novel, Dead Lagoon (1994):
’There can be no true friends without true enemies. Unless we hate what we are not, we cannot love what we are.
These are the old truths we are painfully rediscovering after a century and more of sentimental cant. Those who deny them deny their family, their heritage, their culture, their birthright, their very selves!
They will not lightly be forgiven.’ The unfortunate truth in these old truths cannot be ignored by statesmen and scholars.
For peoples seeking identity and reinventing ethnicity, enemies are essential, and the potentially most dangerous enmities occur across the fault lines between the world's major civilizations.”
It is from this perspective, that I want to develop this project and from which I take a stand. In the diagram behind me I have tried to visualize the quintessence of my ideas.
You could interpret the diagram from the perspective of “seeking identity and reinventing ethnicity”.
Homo sapiens is a social animal with one exceptional and unique quality: his rationality, which enables him to explain his existence and identity ultimately by knowledge, by science.
This does not imply, that homo sapiens is a rational being. Sometimes you even tend to believe that the opposite is true.
The only claim I make is that eventually it was his ability to think in a rational manner, that shaped his existence through evolution into what it is now.
However, when we look at the world how it is now, we must conclude that homo sapiens defines himself, his identity, his values, his social bonds in ways, ranging from irrationally to rational.
“For peoples seeking identity and reinventing ethnicity, enemies are essential…” and your first enemy is the person who does not believe in the same god as you do.
When you drop religion, you still can stick to the bonds within your tribe and if tribes are no longer the binding factor, you still have your country, your nation-state.
If the nation-state ceases to bind people, they still have their family.
When the family falls apart the homo sapiens realizes, that eventually he is only an individual, who has to define himself like Descartes did with his “Cogito, ergo sum”.
Eventually, what is left to homo sapiens is his rationality, which enables him to understand and interpret the reality he lives in.
That is what enabled him to develop physics or medical science, what made him visit the moon or communicate using his cellphone.
Against this background I’ll try to analyze, how man eventually defined his existentialist position and then I’ll try to understand this human condition in relation to claims that free will might be an illusion.
And we even may discover, that existentialism as we know it, is not at all the kind of interpretation of individualism in conjunction with rationality we seek.
Thank you for your attention…the floor is yours :-)
[13:19] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): have to rush off
[13:19] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): will think on it all
[13:19] Violet (ataraxia.azemus): Great writeup, Herman :)
[13:19] Chantal (nymf.hathaway): This will be an interesting journey
[13:19] herman Bergson: This was only the introduction :-))
[13:19] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ♥ Thank Youuuuuuuuuu!! ♥
[13:19] Areyn Laurasia: Be well, Gemma
[13:19] Violet (ataraxia.azemus): Take care, Gemma
[13:20] Bejiita Imako: cu gemma
[13:20] CB Axel: You're saying in part that our identities are based on who our enemies are?
[13:20] herman Bergson: really nice of Gemma....she came on for the lecture....
[13:20] Violet (ataraxia.azemus): Free will as a requisite for existentialism is interesting...
[13:20] CB Axel: Bye, Gemma.
[13:20] Bejiita Imako: yes indeed
[13:20] herman Bergson: Ahh CB, yes that CAN be the case and often is
[13:21] herman Bergson: but it is not a necessary condition for defining your identity
[13:21] Violet (ataraxia.azemus): Though I can see that; I've always seen existentialism a bit more accepting of the limits on choice
[13:21] CB Axel: I see.
[13:21] Bejiita Imako: I feel lke i decide for myself, that nothing else makes all my decisions so i d say i have a free will
[13:21] Bejiita Imako: but maybe its more complex
[13:22] Bejiita Imako: its an interesting concept
[13:22] herman Bergson: Well Violet, I actually want to "use" the development of existentialism as a way of focusing on the idea of individualism
[13:22] herman Bergson: in the way Weber investigates it
[13:23] herman Bergson: Descartes reduced man to a single "I"
[13:23] Areyn Laurasia: “In the moment when I truly understand my enemy, understand him well enough to defeat him, then in that very moment I also love him. I think it’s impossible to really understand somebody, what they want, what they believe, and not love them the way they love themselves. And then, in that very moment when I love them.... I destroy them.” ― Orson Scott Card, Ender's Game
[13:23] Violet (ataraxia.azemus): It's a good filter for individual meaning... and whether we have any control over our actions, and therefore meaning, is a pretty existential idea :)
[13:23] herman Bergson: Ender's game !
[13:23] Violet (ataraxia.azemus): Unfortunately, I need to run off... Thanks, Herman, everyone. Be well :)
[13:23] herman Bergson: I just read it...
[13:23] Areyn Laurasia: :)
[13:23] Chantal (nymf.hathaway): Bye Violat :))
[13:23] Chantal (nymf.hathaway): Violet even
[13:23] herman Bergson: Bye Violet
[13:24] CB Axel: Bye, Violet.
[13:24] Bejiita Imako: bye violet
[13:24] herman Bergson: I immediately recognized your quote Areyn :-))
[13:24] Areyn Laurasia: I hope I have free will but I'm too persuaded by others thoughts ;)
[13:25] Bejiita Imako: you can get affected by others in deciding thats drue
[13:25] Bejiita Imako: true
[13:25] herman Bergson: It is a whole history and debate what you mean by free will
[13:25] Bejiita Imako: but still its up to you to take control
[13:25] Bejiita Imako: should you or not
[13:25] CB Axel: But you still have the will to not listen to what others are saying.
[13:26] Bejiita Imako: ah
[13:26] Chantal (nymf.hathaway): you can even wonder if that is free will, CB
[13:26] herman Bergson: There is a whole debate going on in economics.... Ration Choice Theory.....
[13:26] herman Bergson: Rational
[13:26] CB Axel: On the other hand, I've heard that the more you hear a particular point of view, the more likely you are to also take that view.
[13:27] Bejiita Imako: that can be true
[13:27] herman Bergson: Just was commercials CB and you're convinced ^_^
[13:27] herman Bergson: watch
[13:27] CB Axel: I don't watch them. °͜°
[13:28] herman Bergson: Smart !...defending and protecting your free will :-))
[13:28] Bejiita Imako: i just thought of same things
[13:28] illing Edman: Sorry guys I missed the whole class...My sister walked in with her boyfriend so I better stop.... till the next time Sorry !
[13:28] Chantal (nymf.hathaway): Enjoy Illing ㋡
[13:28] herman Bergson: Greetings to your sister and friend Illing :-)
[13:28] CB Axel: Please join us again next time, illing.
[13:28] illing Edman: bye
[13:28] herman Bergson: Bye :-)
[13:28] illing Edman: I will certainly come the next time again
[13:29] illing Edman: kisses
[13:29] Bejiita Imako: o the other hand i dont need to be fed with coca cola commercial in order to know its good stuff
[13:29] herman Bergson: Ahhh...talking about the next time.....
[13:29] Bejiita Imako: ㋡
[13:29] herman Bergson: I have something important to say about that.....
[13:29] CB Axel: Bleech. I prefer Pepsi. LOL
[13:29] Bejiita Imako: hehehe
[13:30] herman Bergson: yes Pepsi is better
[13:30] herman Bergson: When will be the next time....?????
[13:30] herman Bergson: I will tell you....
[13:30] CB Axel: Don't take our word on that, though, Bejiita. Exercise your free will.
[13:30] herman Bergson: JANUARY 2016.....
[13:30] herman Bergson: Let me explain...
[13:31] herman Bergson: In RL I am in the middle of selling my house and buying a new one and then moving to another part of the country....
[13:31] CB Axel: Again?
[13:31] Chantal (nymf.hathaway): surrounded by tulips he will be ㋡
[13:31] herman Bergson: it creates a lot of ado and stress, consumes time for packing a whole household...and so on
[13:32] herman Bergson: Yes..in springtime I'll show you pictures :-)
[13:32] herman Bergson: So I have decided to postpone continuation of this project till I am sellted in again in my new home
[13:33] Chantal (nymf.hathaway): Can only understand ㋡ and hope all goes smooth
[13:33] herman Bergson: In other words...I send you on a nice vacation again ....
[13:33] CB Axel nods
[13:33] Bejiita Imako: indeed, hope all goes well
[13:33] CB Axel: I hate moving house.
[13:33] Bejiita Imako: ㋡
[13:33] Bejiita Imako: its a hell of work
[13:33] Chantal (nymf.hathaway): yes is
[13:33] Bejiita Imako: but nice when done
[13:34] herman Bergson: Yes Bejiita...that in itself is already our main and permant worry....
[13:34] Areyn Laurasia: a change of scenery is always nice
[13:34] herman Bergson: Oh yes Areyn :-)
[13:34] Chantal (nymf.hathaway): Fields of tulips... fields as far as he can see :))))
[13:35] herman Bergson: Now I live in a part of the country where they speak a dialect, which isn't my way.....I gonna move back to where they speak real Dutch :-)
[13:35] CB Axel: °͜°
[13:35] Chantal (nymf.hathaway): ㋡
[13:35] Bejiita Imako: aa ok
[13:35] herman Bergson: But at this moment the situation is a kind of clif hanger.....
[13:36] herman Bergson: we need the 100% confirmation of several things...they are now still in the 99% certain phase
[13:36] Chantal (nymf.hathaway): Stressful :(
[13:37] CB Axel: Dang 1%'ers.
[13:37] herman Bergson: indeed :-)
Post a Comment