Thursday, September 29, 2022

1017: First steps....

 In the previous lecture, I brought to your attention the famous "Is / OUGHT" question, which states that you can not logically deduce what you ought to do from a factual description of reality.

   

Yet we have a lot of convictions, religions or ideologies, that tell us how we have to act in relation to the real world, we live in.

 

Of course, materialism doesn't escape from this feature, but it explains why I said that it is the philosophy most people don't like.

  

The origins of materialism lie in the ancient world and arose in contrast to religious schools of thought.  

  

The religious schools derived much of their teachings on ethical life from their religious doctrines.

  

In the later, monotheistic traditions, the glory of the spiritual stood in contrast to the "lowly" pleasures of the body.

   

But what to do, when you have no punishing god, no perspective of earning a place in the afterlife or progressing in the chain of reincarnations. What if you are just here in this world?

    

It isn't surprising that the word "materialistic", as we saw in the previous lecture means "believing that having money and possessions is the most important thing in life"

  

The materialist is only after lust and luxury in his life, at least that is a standard reproach of those who believe in all those "higher" values in life.

   

However, the most famous materialist of the Ancient World, Epicurus, (341 - 270 BC) lived ascetically, along with the majority 

  

of philosophically inclined people of his time in Athens and taught in his school that this was the appropriate way to live.

  

although critics can cite instances in his writings that are ambiguous on the question, for Epicurus the path to pleasure was by no means associated with excess and lavish taste.

   

Epicurus and his followers were known for eating simple meals and discussing a wide range of philosophical subjects. He openly allowed women and slaves to join the school as a matter of policy.

  

An interesting historical detail is that Epicurus is said to have originally written over 300 works on various subjects, but the vast majority of these writings have been lost.

  

I mention it because he is not the only materialist in history, whose works have disappeared. We'll get to that in another lecture.

   

For Epicurus, the purpose of philosophy was to help people attain a happy (eudaimonic), tranquil life characterized by ataraxia (peace and freedom from fear) and aponia (the absence of pain). 

  

He advocated that people were best able to pursue philosophy by living a self-sufficient life surrounded by friends. 

  

He taught that the root of all human neurosis is death denial and the tendency for human beings to assume that death will be horrific and painful, 

  

which he claimed causes unnecessary anxiety, selfish self-protective behaviors, and hypocrisy. 

   

According to Epicurus, death is the end of both the body and the soul and therefore should not be feared, a clear materialist point of view.

   

Epicurus taught that although the gods exist, they have no involvement in human affairs. Makes you wonder, of course, why they exist. 

    

He taught that people should behave ethically not because the gods punish or reward people for their actions, 

  

but because amoral behavior will burden them with guilt and prevent them from attaining ataraxia.

   

Epicurus was an empiricist, meaning he believed that the senses are the only reliable source of knowledge about the world. 

  

These are the basic views of a materialist and Epicurus wasn't the only one who held such a view. The next lecture may surprise you in that sense.

     

Thank you for your attention again.....


 

Main Sources:

MacMillan The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edition

Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1995
 http://plato.stanford.edu/contents.htm
R.G. Brown/J. Layman, "Materialism", Routledge (2019)


TABLE OF CONTENT -----------------------------------------------------------------  


  1 - 100 Philosophers                         9 May 2009  Start of

  2 - 25+ Women Philosophers                       10 May 2009  this blog

  3 - 25 Adventures in Thinking                       10 May 2009

  4 - Modern Theories of Ethics                       29 Oct  2009

  5 - The Ideal State                                               24 Febr 2010   /   234

  6 - The Mystery of the Brain                                  3 Sept 2010   /   266

  7 - The Utopia of the Free Market                       16 Febr 2012    /   383

  8. - The Aftermath of Neo-liberalism                      5 Sept 2012   /   413

  9. - The Art Not to Be an Egoist                             6 Nov  2012   /   426                        

10  - Non-Western Philosophy                               29 May 2013    /   477

11  -  Why Science is Right                                      2 Sept 2014   /   534      

12  - A Philosopher looks at Atheism                        1 Jan  2015   /   557

13  - EVIL, a philosophical investigation                 17 Apr  2015   /   580                

14  - Existentialism and Free Will                             2 Sept 2015   /   586         

15 - Spinoza                                                             2 Sept 2016   /   615

16 - The Meaning of Life                                        13 Febr 2017   /   637

17 - In Search of  my Self                                        6 Sept 2017   /   670

18 - The 20th Century Revisited                              3 Apr  2018    /   706

19 - The Pessimist                                                  11 Jan 2020    /   819

20 - The Optimist                                                     9 Febr 2020   /   824

21 - Awakening from a Neoliberal Dream                8 Oct  2020   /   872

22 - A World Full of Patterns                                    1 Apr 2021    /   912

23 - The Concept of Freedom                                  8 Jan 2022    /   965


The Discussion



[13:21] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): Thank you Herman

[13:21] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): interesting

[13:22] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): I like his idea of death denial

[13:22] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): He openly allowed women and slaves to join the school as a matter of policy...wasn't it normal in those days that woman join't classes?

[13:22] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ignore it I mean

[13:22] herman Bergson: One of the most interesting things to me is that most of Epicurus writings have been destroyed, have disappeared....

[13:22] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): how do we know they existed then?

[13:23] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): to begin with

[13:23] herman Bergson: No....According to Aristotle women weren't even full human beings....expressing the beliefs of those times

[13:24] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ha

[13:24] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): these times men believe woman are second too

[13:24] herman Bergson: We know that they have existed because others who lived in those times and somewhat later reported about that fact Gemma

[13:24] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): women are still fighting that issue

[13:24] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ah ok

[13:25] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): actually I figured that

[13:25] herman Bergson: Yes, this woman / man equality issue....really amazing....

[13:26] herman Bergson: Probably Epicurus saw all humans as being equal

[13:26] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): I guess he also liked food

[13:26] herman Bergson: Contrary to his contemporaries

[13:27] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): food cooked by woman and slaves I suppose

[13:27] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate) GIGGLES!!

[13:27] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ...LOL...

[13:27] herman Bergson: Ahh He allowed them to the kitchen ....I see :-)

[13:27] herman Bergson: Interesting historical finding :-))

[13:28] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): i'd served him coffee with salt

[13:28] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): omg lol

[13:28] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): OMG!!!

[13:28] bergfrau Apfelbaum: lol

[13:28] herman Bergson: But the general issue here is that materialism denies the existence of an Otherworld...

[13:28] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): yes

[13:29] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): and living a life of pleasure not pain

[13:29] herman Bergson: and instead of the fact that people who believed in Otherworld and gods became unpopular, materialists became unpopular

[13:29] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): why was that?

[13:29] herman Bergson: an interesting phenomenon

[13:30] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): you mean popular to those who believed?????

[13:30] herman Bergson: There maybe several reasons Beertje....

[13:30] herman Bergson: No Gemma ...popular to those who were in control in society....

[13:30] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): but you have both in that last sentence

[13:30] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): the same

[13:31] herman Bergson: MAterialists dont have a common basis for ethics

[13:31] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): both became unpopular

[13:31] herman Bergson: it is debatable...

[13:31] oola Neruda: it would be difficult to raise an army if death was the "dead end"

[13:31] herman Bergson: Religious believers are the easiest to control....

[13:32] herman Bergson: Maybe too , oola

[13:32] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): very true

[13:33] herman Bergson: Where the materialist still has to figure out a lot about life and existence, the (religious) believer already has all the answers

[13:33] Ciska Riverstone is offline.

[13:33] oola Neruda: that would not have to be only with Christians.... Valkyries were said to take the fallen to Vahalla....

[13:33] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): which makes it simpler

[13:33] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): oh right

[13:33] herman Bergson: And when those in power say YES those are the right answers stick to them or perish....

[13:34] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): most religions have afterlife as a reward

[13:34] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): phone

[13:34] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate) will be right back.

[13:34] herman Bergson: It applies to any religion or ideology oola

[13:34] oola Neruda: yes...

[13:35] herman Bergson: gather the people under an ideological umbrella and the flock will follow the leader

[13:35] herman Bergson: people want to feel safe and secure....

[13:36] herman Bergson: the way to achieve that  is to give them answers...and religions do so

[13:36] herman Bergson: like ideologies

[13:36] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): religions give also fear

[13:36] herman Bergson: In that sense, materialism makes people insecure....

[13:36] oola Neruda: yes

[13:37] herman Bergson: the soul dies with the body...???? OMG......and what happens after that????

[13:37] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): nothing

[13:37] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): the people left grieve

[13:37] theo Velde is offline.

[13:37] herman Bergson: That is how our mind works....we prolong the consciousness of time across the border of death

[13:38] herman Bergson: Yes Gemma....to die is easy.....to be left behind is the real thing after a death

[13:38] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): oola said that well

[13:38] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): last week

[13:39] herman Bergson: Those who stay behind are confronted with the fact that it can be them next time

[13:39] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): you never know

[13:40] herman Bergson: That is what makes people insecure and take refuge to a religion....if it happens it is God's will...aahhhh good....not my problem then :-)

[13:41] herman Bergson: Just to have the consolation to know that god knows what is best for me....that feels good

[13:41] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): well i think a lot has to do with upbringing

[13:41] herman Bergson: of course....

[13:41] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): not taking refuge

[13:43] herman Bergson: But religion (and ideology) are such deeply rooted cultural phenomena....

[13:44] herman Bergson: Epicurus questioned this aspect of life already more that 2000 years ago...

[13:45] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): I am  sure he was not the only one and we will hear about others

[13:45] oola Neruda: am thinking of India where the body is burned and the ashes put into the river....

[13:45] herman Bergson: and in a next lecture you'll learn that it wasn't the Ancient Greeks who as first ones came up with these questions

[13:46] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): that is where my body is going

[13:46] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): not their river tho

[13:46] herman Bergson: My general observation is that through history you see two groups of people

[13:47] herman Bergson: on the one hand believers of all kinds, and on the other hand those who said...there is nothing more than us and the world

[13:47] herman Bergson: world

[13:47] herman Bergson: and that second group has always lost the debate

[13:48] herman Bergson: until........?????

[13:48] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): well i see another group of those who are constantly seeking answers

[13:49] herman Bergson: it depends on the questions to what side they belong, I'd say Gemma

[13:50] herman Bergson: Well...let me leave you with all the questions for now and prepare for next lecture :-))

[13:50] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ok!

[13:50] herman Bergson: Thank you all again...:-)

[13:50] herman Bergson: Class dismissed....

[13:50] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): Thank you

Monday, September 26, 2022

1016: Let's get started...

 


In the previous lecture I stated my position: get down to earth and focus on this material world as our habitat.

  

I am likely to be admonished for partiality, selectivity, over-simplification, and subjective bias, and I am likely guilty as charged, to a greater or lesser extent. 

  

Nonetheless, in this case, it is important to do this project because of all topics in epistemology (theory of knowledge) and metaphysics, 

  

which lie at the heart of philosophy it is at this moment maybe one of the most important subjects in a world 

  

where you see on the one hand religious fanaticism and on the other hand a steady decline of traditional churches.

   

In much contemporary discourse, the word "materialistic" refers to a way of life". 

  

The Cambridge dictionary defines it as "believing that having money and possessions is the most important thing in life". 

  

If you could call the followers of such a way of life "materialists", then it is important to emphasize, that this is exactly NOT the meaning of the word "materialist" that is meant here. 

   

I am dealing with philosophical materialism, which at heart is a theory about the kind of things that exist. 

  

To adopt such a philosophical stance has no necessary connection with any particular attitude about how life should or should not be lived.

   

The basic idea here is that we can not deduce "ought" from "is". This means, that when you give a factual description of a situation, 

   

there is no way to deduce logically what, for instance, has to be done, what you ought to do.

   

When you go outside and you say: "Oh my, it is raining cats and dogs", in this observation there is nothing that tells you that you "ought" to use an umbrella.

  

A short sidetrack: The is-ought problem is a philosophical problem of how knowledge of the present world does not necessarily lead 

  

to the knowledge of how the world ought to be. It was David Hume (1711 - 1776) who brought this issue to our attention.

   

The is-ought problem has become prominent in matters of ethics. Simply put, it deals with    an apparent logic gap 

   

between statements of what "ought" to be, following statements regarding what "is". The first often follows the second without any kind of explanation regarding why they are logical or correct.

  

Furthermore, it argues that just because someone has knowledge of how the world is (descriptive statements), 

  

this doesn't automatically prove that they know how the world ought to be (prescriptive statements) and it is in fact impossible to derive the second based solely on the information of the first. 

  

It may be a side-track, but nevertheless yet related to our theme. In our definition of materialism, we assume a certain ontology, a certain idea of what really exists. 

  

The religious schools derive much of their teachings on ethics from their religious doctrines, which of course include a narrative about what exists. 

  

With no religious beliefs to turn to as the bedrock of philosophical materialism, we point at the real world around us as the goal of life, instead of pointing at all kinds of afterlife and reincarnation. 

   

So maybe one of our questions will be: how do we manage without a religion?

   

Thank you for your attention....

   

 

Main Sources:

MacMillan The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edition

Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1995
 http://plato.stanford.edu/contents.htm
R.G. Brown/J. Layman, "Materialism", Routledge (2019)


TABLE OF CONTENT -----------------------------------------------------------------  


  1 - 100 Philosophers                         9 May 2009  Start of

  2 - 25+ Women Philosophers                       10 May 2009  this blog

  3 - 25 Adventures in Thinking                       10 May 2009

  4 - Modern Theories of Ethics                       29 Oct  2009

  5 - The Ideal State                                               24 Febr 2010   /   234

  6 - The Mystery of the Brain                                  3 Sept 2010   /   266

  7 - The Utopia of the Free Market                       16 Febr 2012    /   383

  8. - The Aftermath of Neo-liberalism                      5 Sept 2012   /   413

  9. - The Art Not to Be an Egoist                             6 Nov  2012   /   426                        

10  - Non-Western Philosophy                               29 May 2013    /   477

11  -  Why Science is Right                                      2 Sept 2014   /   534      

12  - A Philosopher looks at Atheism                        1 Jan  2015   /   557

13  - EVIL, a philosophical investigation                 17 Apr  2015   /   580                

14  - Existentialism and Free Will                             2 Sept 2015   /   586         

15 - Spinoza                                                             2 Sept 2016   /   615

16 - The Meaning of Life                                        13 Febr 2017   /   637

17 - In Search of  my Self                                        6 Sept 2017   /   670

18 - The 20th Century Revisited                              3 Apr  2018    /   706

19 - The Pessimist                                                  11 Jan 2020    /   819

20 - The Optimist                                                     9 Febr 2020   /   824

21 - Awakening from a Neoliberal Dream                8 Oct  2020   /   872

22 - A World Full of Patterns                                    1 Apr 2021    /   912

23 - The Concept of Freedom                                  8 Jan 2022    /   965


The Discussion


[13:23] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): Thank you Herman

[13:24] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): seems like we stopped in the middle of the definition

[13:24] herman Bergson: A world without religion.......

[13:24] oola Neruda: do you have an answer to that question???

[13:25] herman Bergson: What do you mean Gemma?

[13:25] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): materialism is

[13:25] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): a theory

[13:25] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): of

[13:25] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): existance

[13:26] herman Bergson: well...materialism is the conviction that there is nothing more than us...a bunch of molecules :-)

[13:26] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): and....

[13:26] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ok

[13:26] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): that makes sense

[13:26] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): but then the mind ........

[13:27] herman Bergson: The funny part however is that we, these bunches of molecules, are aware of our existence

[13:27] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): yes that is what i mean

[13:27] herman Bergson: If you look around in nature that is quite na exceptional thing...

[13:28] herman Bergson: however not 100%...

[13:28] herman Bergson: Frans de Waal and others have shown that there are primates that have SOME level of selfawareness..

[13:29] herman Bergson: But not the kind we have...

[13:29] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): yes

[13:29] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): and even some other mammels

[13:29] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): whales

[13:29] herman Bergson: so..it is not an unnatural phenomenon....it is just that homo sapiens got the best of it

[13:29] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): so far we are

[13:30] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): oola asked a question

[13:30] herman Bergson: at least..interpreted it from a pretty egocentric view...yes I like that I am :-))

[13:31] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): is it a blessing that we are aware of our existence?

[13:31] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ah

[13:31] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate) GIGGLES!!

[13:31] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ...LOL...

[13:31] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): not sure beertje

[13:31] herman Bergson: She asked for an answer to a question indeed...what question, oola?

[13:32] herman Bergson: Well Beertje...as a true existentialist.......:-)

[13:32] herman Bergson: Satre would say that we are condemned to freedom

[[13:32] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): are we?

[13:33] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): hi andrew

[13:33] oola Neruda: I cannot remember the question...

[13:33] oola Neruda: Welcome Andrew

[13:33] AndrewEagle01: Hello Gemma Hello Everyone (sorry i'm late)

[13:33] herman Bergson: yes...we HAVE to choose...Beertje...every day......

[13:33] AndrewEagle01: Hello Aalo

[13:33] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): [13:24] herman Bergson: A world without religion.......

[13:24] oola Neruda: do you have an answer to that question???

[13:33] herman Bergson: The Eagle has landed, I see :-)

[13:33] AndrewEagle01: Smiles

[13:34] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ♥ Thank Youuuuuuuuuu!! ♥

[13:34] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): right beertje

[13:34] oola Neruda: no... but I imagine that police would be a good start... or a despot

[13:34] herman Bergson: To the question...what about a world without religion?

[13:35] oola Neruda: Trump lives like there was no thought about morality in life... it could probably make him happy

[13:36] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): very true

[13:36] herman Bergson: Right....

[13:36] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): only if everyone believes his lies

[13:36] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): sigh

[13:36] AndrewEagle01: a World without belief is a world without questioning. Religions are the results of different answers

[13:36] herman Bergson: And that is why he is going down at the moment....

[13:36] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): so unbelievable

[13:36] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): oh good answer andrew

[13:36] herman Bergson: A world without religion....

[13:37] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): would be more peacefull

[13:37] herman Bergson: To begin with...

[13:37] oola Neruda: indeed

[13:37] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): not sure about that tho beertje

[13:37] herman Bergson: there is no world without beliefes....

[13:37] AndrewEagle01: The problem is not religions but covetousness. Human beings use religion to satisfy their lusts

[13:37] herman Bergson: former lecture Gemma already said..yea yeah..but science is also a bucket of beliefs...

[13:38] herman Bergson: and yes...she is right...

[13:38] herman Bergson: we really have to believe that tomorrow the sun will rise again....in fact we actually do that every night we go to sleep

[13:39] oola Neruda: is religion a list of "don't do this"..... or is it a search for the mysteries we meet in life.... like... where do we come from... or  death

[13:39] herman Bergson: is that a stupid idea...what proof do you have....?

[13:39] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): i'm not that certain anymore about the sun..with Putin in our backyard

[13:39] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): both i think oola

[13:39] herman Bergson: We just believe it

[13:39] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): sigh beertje yes

[13:40] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): or do we just hope

[13:40] herman Bergson: that makes this belief not a religion....

[13:40] AndrewEagle01: Smiles at beertje

[13:40] herman Bergson: Stay away fromthat for a moment Beertje

[13:40] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): ok

[13:41] herman Bergson: That the sun will rise again, can only be an expectation of the individual....

[13:41] AndrewEagle01: the idea all first comes from a person. Then, it very often happens that the idea overtakes its designer to become superior to him, and even untouchable.

People in general are willing to die for an ideology they believe in.

[13:41] herman Bergson: we take it for granted, but we never have a guarantee....every day again

[13:42] herman Bergson: There you go Andrew.....

[13:42] AndrewEagle01: example : freedom

[13:42] herman Bergson: we add something to our daily beliefs.....

[13:42] herman Bergson: we add a cause

[13:43] herman Bergson: we believe that  the sun rises every day, because.........

[13:43] herman Bergson: and there comes in ....religion

[13:43] herman Bergson: our addition, our fantasy about reality

[13:44] herman Bergson: why?

[13:44] AndrewEagle01: Life is terrifying because it inevitably ends in death

[13:44] oola Neruda: especially that

[13:44] herman Bergson: Because we want to feel safe and secured....

[13:44] AndrewEagle01: Nods

[13:44] herman Bergson: well...you hit the nail on the head Andrew

[13:45] herman Bergson: But this need to fel safe and secure is jsut a basic drive of every living organism on this planet...

[13:45] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): i guess if we did not believe we would be long gone

[13:45] herman Bergson: nothing special or exceptional

[13:46] oola Neruda: I feel there is a need for "justice"... especially when we see the un just

[13:46] herman Bergson: I dont think so Gemma...

[13:46] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): i mean individuals would worry to death

[13:46] herman Bergson: then we would live like the wilderbeast on the savanna in Africa...

[13:47] AndrewEagle01: Smiles

[13:47] herman Bergson: Our existential "problem" is that we experience individuality

[13:47] CONNIE Eichel is online.

[13:47] AndrewEagle01: yes individuality We must give meaning to this life which inevitably leads us to death.

[13:48] herman Bergson: I CAN feel being a member of some group...but I also can alienate from  it

[13:48] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): acceptance of death helps i think

[13:48] AndrewEagle01: Nods

[13:48] AndrewEagle01: acceptance of death is an idea

[13:48] herman Bergson: I dont see deathas a prblem....:-)

[13:49] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): no but many do

[13:49] herman Bergson: that is just a matter of light on/light off

[13:49] oola Neruda: it is when it is your child

[13:49] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): true oola

[13:49] herman Bergson: the problem of death is the problem of the people that stay behind...

[13:50] oola Neruda: true.... and the belief is a balm

[13:50] herman Bergson: they have to LIVE with the fact that you arent there anymore

[13:50] oola Neruda: it is the LOSS

[[13:50] herman Bergson: you are just dead...quiet an simple

[13:51] oola Neruda: that child was innocent....

[13:51] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): i always hate to think of others sorting my stuff

[13:51] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): glad i will not watch it

[13:51] herman Bergson: there is no guilt in dieing...you just die

[13:51] AndrewEagle01: I'm agree

[13:52] oola Neruda: been there... done that...the child did not get a fair chance

[13:52] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): life is not fair

[13:52] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): is life fair........

[13:52] oola Neruda: nope

[13:52] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): nope

[13:52] herman Bergson: True Gemma...as long as you life...live it :-)

[13:52] oola Neruda: but you don't have to like it

[13:52] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): right

[13:52] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): to both

[13:53] herman Bergson: We don't lifre for fun...we are just alive

[13:53] AndrewEagle01: Misfortune reaches without distinction, the good and the bad

[13:53] herman Bergson: that you have fu doing so is your doing...

[13:53] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): pizza helps

[13:54] herman Bergson: no...sushi tomorrow Gemma :-)

[13:54] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ah

[13:54] AndrewEagle01: Living for fun is an idea from our rich countries

[13:54] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ah yes

[13:54] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): true

[13:54] oola Neruda: very true...

[13:55] herman Bergson: I disagree, Anrew....

[13:55] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): sustenance is gone for them

[13:55] oola Neruda: although in Africa... I saw people who created their fun

[13:55] herman Bergson: that is what I mean...!

[13:55] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): can find that anywhere

[13:56] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): on teh streets of any city or town

[13:56] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): kids playing soccer

[13:56] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): or kicking sticks around

[13:56] AndrewEagle01: Maslow's pyramid is relentless, I'll let it argue for me

[13:57] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): that should be in the wall here

[13:57] herman Bergson: But that pyramid doesn't say anything about the material circumstances people can live in Andrew....

[13:57] herman Bergson: So it applies to any civilization

[13:57] oola Neruda: some have a better chance at succeeding .... others develop a strength inside them that makes it happen

[13:57] herman Bergson: The basic needs stay the basic needs indeed

[13:58] AndrewEagle01: yes

[13:59] herman Bergson: Well...if we didn't save the world today...we certainly saved our beliefs :-)

[13:59] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): I hope to make it Tuesday

[13:59] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): next part

[13:59] herman Bergson: SO thank you all again...nice discussion again

[13:59] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): ♥ Thank Youuuuuuuuuu!! ♥

[13:59] herman Bergson: The beat goes on Gemma :-))

[13:59] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): Thank you Herman

[13:59] herman Bergson: Thank you all again...

[13:59] AndrewEagle01: Thank you Herman, once again  it was very interesting

[13:59] herman Bergson: Class dismissed..

[14:00] Gemma (gemma.cleanslate): back to decorating the new sl newser building

[14:00] herman Bergson: good luck with that Gemma

[14:00] herman Bergson: What do you teach Andrew???

[14:00] herman Bergson: If I may ask

[14:01] AndrewEagle01: Philosophy of course

[14:01] AndrewEagle01: smiles

[14:01] herman Bergson: oh my...the competition is in the house

[14:01] AndrewEagle01: laughs

[14:01] herman Bergson: You really do???

[14:01] herman Bergson: Where?

[14:02] AndrewEagle01: no way.. i think you have more wise

[14:02] AndrewEagle01: At School in SL young adult

[14:02] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): can one compete in philosophy?

[14:03] herman Bergson: Well Beertje...if you knew how it is in academic circles.....

[14:03] AndrewEagle01: Competition is about wisdom. And as in wisdom, there is no competition, so no competition

[14:03] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont):

[14:04] herman Bergson: the fun in philosophy is just that you can disagree with the other :-)

[14:04] AndrewEagle01: indeed the academic circle is sometimes very sneaky

[14:04] herman Bergson: that is all we have...disagreement...and then ...good arguments

[14:05] AndrewEagle01: Smiles i disagree Herman....... no i agree :)

[14:05] herman Bergson: I disagree Andrew..:-))

[14:05] AndrewEagle01: Smiles

[14:06] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): no i agree = een tegenstelling

[14:06] .: Beertje :. (beertje.beaumont): don't know haw to say it in english

[14:06] AndrewEagle01: Amazing

[14:06] herman Bergson: lol Beertje

[14:07] herman Bergson: we call is a paradox...NO...I agree :-))

[14:07] AndrewEagle01: Nods :)

[14:08] herman Bergson: Funny girl she is, Andrew...we have to be careful with our words

[14:08] AndrewEagle01: Smiles